<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Oh, James &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/</link>
	<description>New York Times &#38; USA Today Bestselling Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Estep		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4519</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Estep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Edie -- Yes, they did, but I thought it was a really cool chase scene. But then again, I loved just about everything in the movie. It was just sooo good! :blos:

Michele -- It does sound like a physics problem. It&#039;s just ... ugh.

Danette -- Yeah, it&#039;s sad. Supposedly, the movie is about Bond trying to come to terms with his lover&#039;s betrayal in Casino Royale. And I think they&#039;ve used all the rest of the Fleming&#039;s titles already. Still ... there had to have been something better ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edie &#8212; Yes, they did, but I thought it was a really cool chase scene. But then again, I loved just about everything in the movie. It was just sooo good! :blos:</p>
<p>Michele &#8212; It does sound like a physics problem. It&#8217;s just &#8230; ugh.</p>
<p>Danette &#8212; Yeah, it&#8217;s sad. Supposedly, the movie is about Bond trying to come to terms with his lover&#8217;s betrayal in Casino Royale. And I think they&#8217;ve used all the rest of the Fleming&#8217;s titles already. Still &#8230; there had to have been something better &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: danette		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a sad title, why would they do a title that means a small unit of relief from grief. I guess we don&#039;t always watch movies for the title. :lol:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sad title, why would they do a title that means a small unit of relief from grief. I guess we don&#8217;t always watch movies for the title. 😆</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michele L.		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michele L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s terrible! It doesn&#039;t even make any sense! I can&#039;t imagine what they were thinking. It sounds to me like a physics problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s terrible! It doesn&#8217;t even make any sense! I can&#8217;t imagine what they were thinking. It sounds to me like a physics problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edie		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4490</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t they have a looooong action scene in the beginning?  I dislike movies that start with action scenes.  They bore me from the start.  

I liked the poker game.  I thought that was awesome characterization.  Daniel Craig is a really good actor and brought a new dimension to Bond that&#039;s been missing.  He&#039;s hot too!  But the many action scenes bored me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t they have a looooong action scene in the beginning?  I dislike movies that start with action scenes.  They bore me from the start.  </p>
<p>I liked the poker game.  I thought that was awesome characterization.  Daniel Craig is a really good actor and brought a new dimension to Bond that&#8217;s been missing.  He&#8217;s hot too!  But the many action scenes bored me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Estep		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Estep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tia and Amy -- You&#039;re right. It&#039;s such a crappy title. What were they thinking?

Edie -- You didn&#039;t like Casino Royale? I thought it was one of the best Bond movies in a loooong time. Maybe the best one ever. Daniel Craig was so good in it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tia and Amy &#8212; You&#8217;re right. It&#8217;s such a crappy title. What were they thinking?</p>
<p>Edie &#8212; You didn&#8217;t like Casino Royale? I thought it was one of the best Bond movies in a loooong time. Maybe the best one ever. Daniel Craig was so good in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edie		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree, it sucks.  The new James Bond is hot, but I won&#039;t be eager to see the next movie, whatever the title.  I liked the character building in the last one, but the action scenes were too protracted and bored me. :neutral:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it sucks.  The new James Bond is hot, but I won&#8217;t be eager to see the next movie, whatever the title.  I liked the character building in the last one, but the action scenes were too protracted and bored me. 😐</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amy		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4450</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw that this morning and wondered what they were thinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that this morning and wondered what they were thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tia Nevitt		</title>
		<link>https://www.jenniferestep.com/oh-james/#comment-4449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tia Nevitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.jenniferestep.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree. It&#039;s horrible. A real head-scratcher.

Love your analysis of James Bond titles!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It&#8217;s horrible. A real head-scratcher.</p>
<p>Love your analysis of James Bond titles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
